EdTech development services
Learning platforms that hold together across the student experience
ABM Technologies helps universities, community colleges and education technology companies implement, migrate, integrate and operate the platforms that carry teaching and student support.
- Who we work with
- University CIOs and CTOs, digital-learning leaders, student-success teams, LMS administrators, online program providers
- Typical engagements
- Open edX implementation, LMS migration, LMS–SIS and LTI integration, managed LMS, student-success data
- Audience pages
- Public Universities · Community Colleges · Online Program Providers
Main challenges
What slows down education technology teams
Platforms adopted separately
LMS, SIS, CRM and support tools arrived at different times, so course, enrollment and student records diverge.
Migrations that stall
Course content, grades, integrations and faculty workflow all have to move together, inside an academic calendar.
Student data governance
FERPA obligations shape what student support tools — including AI assistants — are allowed to see and keep.
Small teams, permanent platforms
A handful of administrators operate systems the whole institution depends on, every term.
Relevant capabilities
Capabilities applied to learning platforms and student success
Open edX implementation
Deployment, theming, course tooling and operational setup for institutions and program providers.
See Our Open edX Implementation ApproachLMS migration
Content, grades, integrations and faculty workflow moved on a plan built around the academic calendar.
See Our LMS Migration ApproachLMS–SIS and LTI integration
Enrollment, roster, grade and tool integrations that hold up at term start rather than needing manual repair.
See Our LMS–SIS Integration ApproachManaged LMS services
Upgrades, monitoring, support and release management for platforms your team cannot take offline.
Learn About Managed LMS ServicesStudent-success data & early alerts
Bring engagement, assessment and enrollment signals together so advisors can act early — with clear data boundaries.
Learn About Student-Success Data WorkAI-powered student support
Assistants scoped to what they may access, with human escalation and FERPA-aware governance documented up front.
Learn About FERPA-Safe AI
Audience pages: Public Universities · Community Colleges · Online Program Providers · Student Experience & Intelligence
Common use cases
Where engagements usually begin
- Standing up Open edX for a new online program portfolio
- Migrating from a commercial LMS to Open edX, or between commercial platforms
- Rebuilding LMS–SIS integration so rosters and grades stay synchronized
- Adding LTI tool integrations without breaking existing course structures
- Building an early-alert view for advising and student-success teams
- Taking on managed operation of an LMS a small internal team currently carries
Delivery approach
How we run the work
Understand
We map the systems, the people who depend on them and the constraints you actually work within — procurement, policy, budget cycles.
Design
We agree the target architecture and the user experience, then prove the risky parts early with prototypes rather than documents.
Build & Integrate
Delivery happens in reviewable increments, with integration to existing systems treated as part of the build, not a final step.
Operate & Improve
We monitor, support and keep improving what is live, and we document it so your team can run it without us.
Security, privacy & accessibility
How we handle student data, FERPA and accessibility
What we practice today, described plainly, as working standards rather than formal certifications.
FERPA-aware data boundaries
Define which student records a tool may access, how long it retains them and who reviews automated output — before build starts.
Accessibility for learners
Course experiences and administrative interfaces tested by keyboard and screen reader, with WCAG 2.2 AA as the target.
Integration safety at term start
Roster and grade integrations are load-tested and monitored around the dates when failure is most visible.
Institutional continuity
Runbooks, upgrade notes and handover documentation so platform knowledge does not sit with one person.
Relevant case studies
Work in EdTech
EdTechStarbucks Global Academy
- Problem
- Deliver a consistent global learning platform across five regions (US, Canada, EMEA, Latin America & Caribbean, Asia Pacific) — each with different URLs, LMS links, languages and content availability — without fragmenting the brand or duplicating engineering effort.
- Verified result
- 5 regional website variants live from one codebase, 10 build/staging environments, and 139 content-pipeline scripts delivered.
EdTechASU / EdPlus
- Problem
- Static, fragmented content across events, degree and newsroom pages made program discovery slow for prospective students and every update manual — compounded by integrating dynamic content from multiple databases and APIs, including merging events from three separate sources and adapting a Vue/Bootstrap form to run on Drupal.
- Verified result
- Faster, searchable degree discovery and automated content/form workflows, delivered in support of ASU’s enrollment goals.
EdTechCintana (ASU)
- Problem
- ASU’s academic content platform faced performance bottlenecks as users and data grew, weak role-based access that caused security gaps and admin overhead, manual AWS deployments that bred delays and errors, disorganized content with weak tagging and search, and security/compliance risk around authentication and encryption.
- Verified result
- 1,951+ learners supported, 91% active user engagement, 3,169 courses managed, and 40 partner institutions (93% actively participating).
EdTechDegreeMe (ASU Online)
- Problem
- ASU Online’s degree catalog relied on manual upkeep, producing duplicate and stale listings that eroded recommendation trust; legacy serverless APIs struggled with long AI request times and inconsistent manual deploys; and config-driven forms created keyboard-focus and mobile-rendering failures.
- Verified result
- 143,999 total degree-search users, 8,826 qualified conversions (RFI + app starts), 92,730 organic search clicks, and an 80.1 customer satisfaction (CSAT) score.
EdTechESHE DASH Transcoder (ASU)
- Problem
- ASU’s ESHE platform had a maximum video file size of 350MB, restricting large-scale video processing for course content.
- Verified result
- Enabled seamless transcoding and storage across video formats with automated processing, reduced storage overhead through automatic cleanup, and improved system stability through better error handling.
EdTechLanguage Buddy (ASU)
- Problem
- Traditional language courses inside Canvas lacked scalable speaking practice, and manually reviewing spoken assignments was slow and time-consuming for instructors.
- Verified result
- Faster feedback and unlimited speaking practice for students.
EdTechArizona State University
- Problem
- ASU’s digital touchpoints grew faster than the systems behind them: a dozen standalone corporate-partner landing pages (including the MLB, Uber/UberEats and Pearson programs) were duplicated and maintained by hand at roughly 30 hours/week with a 5.0-second load time; assigning a course designer took 48 hours with duplicated resources and slipped deadlines; and students juggled a dozen logins across services, filling support queues and scoring only 72 on ADA accessibility.
- Verified result
- Landing-page load time fell from 5.0s to 2.0s (−60%) with bounce down 38% and enrollment conversions up 47%; course-designer assignment fell from 48 hours to 4 hours (−91%) with resource reuse up 65% and course launch time down 42%; and the student hub cut support tickets 52%, cut time-to-find-a-resource 64%, and raised accessibility from 72 to 98 (ADA).
Related resources
Further reading

EdTech
Open edX vs Canvas: choosing an LMS for a public university
A decision framework covering cost model, integration surface, accessibility and who ends up operating it.
Promit Mitra · Updated 2026-08-19

EdTech
FERPA-safe AI: what to settle before a student-facing assistant ships
Data boundaries, retention, human review and the questions your general counsel will ask first.
Udita Madan · Updated 2026-08-19

Cross-sector
Accessible digital services: a delivery checklist
What to test at design, build and release so accessibility is not discovered during procurement review.
Udita Madan · Updated 2026-08-19
Plan an LMS migration, integration or managed handover
Tell us the platform, the term you have to be ready for and who operates it today. We will come back with a sequence and the risks we would remove first.

